6 JUN 2006

 

 

Dear Jiancheng,

To bring you up to date, Zhao Chunmei (Karen), editor here at the FLTRP complex, has been diligently translating my current suggestions for implementing the pilot study. I will send you what we have so far, sometime later next week. My reasons for commissioning her were: (1) To save you time having to do it before you talk to colleagues who don’t speak English, and (2) to get someone here at FLTRP to fully understand my overall intentions. I have also asked the house to issue a Letter of Intent (that they will publish and disseminate the findings) and also, under separate cover, give me an agreement to act as my agent for distributing each year’s new learning corpora.

Unfortunately, my room here at the FLTRP hotel does not have Internet access so I am at the mercy of kindness at the research offices. However, I do get to access emails sent to tests@mindspring.com.

Jiancheng, my main reasons for contacting you today are (1) to get a firm commitment that you wish to be the first to research whether “E:P:N classrooms and the use of C-tests” do, indeed, increase both student motivation and (English) language production, and (2) whether you wish to have a second university in on the pilot. If so, please comment as to whether that second university should be here in Beijing or out in Shandong . . . unless you think that three simultaneous pilots might even be better. ???

Feng Lili in Yantai, Shandong, is at ytllf@126.com. Like you, she is Vice Dean and can make her own decisions. She approached me and indicated that she would like to be (at least at some point) an integral part of the study.

I have not as yet contacted anyone here at BFSU with decision-making power, though Grace Shuhua (graceshuhua@sina.com) would like me to. The obvious reason: once you confirm your leadership intent, it should be up to you to decide whom we invite into the first round of data collection. One advantage of having more than one university to start with, is that (1) we role model the communicative approach, and (2) on completion of Phase One, each simply needs to bring in only one other (whom they are willing to help get started) to continue with phases 2, 3, and 4 in order to have a meaningful study to share with the world.

In fact, let’s try to do everything in multiples of three from the start. That’s how the universe has done it ever since its evolution into complex forms. In its macrocosmic form it is in utter chaos, but at the atomic level, it has managed to role model expertly how to create stability . . . and not through forced sameness, but through balanced diversity.

If research turns out to prove that the laws of physics do not extend into the realms of language-learning and psychology, we have lost nothing. However, if the research turns out positive, we have provided a new vehicle for implementing the communicative approach that will lend itself to virtually all levels of task-based activities in all institutions and at all levels of learning. If you have doubts, look at the group picture. Don’t you stand out as the best man to spearhead such a project? I certainly think so! J

In earnest, on anything of this magnitude, one needs to follow one’s higher instincts. I did. And I am now committed to this project for life (as the leader’s best “right hand”).

To success!

Kore via, (heartily yours)

 

Joe

 

http://mylnn.net

 

Home (Blum Enterprise) | Home (C-tests) | Home (E:P:N) | China Proposal | Corpus Intro | Dictionary | EllaZ A.G.I. | FAQs | Google
Instructions | Math Practice | Miscellaneous Links | Research | Sample C-Test | School Statistics | Study Coordinator, Joe Blum